Hi, Just asking because you can integrate it to u-boot python testing framework. http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=tree;f=test/py/tests
Take a look at test_efi* files. Maybe you can integrate it there. Thanks, Michal On 09. 04. 19 9:59, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 08:16:40AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote: >> Hi, >> >> how do you run it? > > Just run EDK2's Shell.efi and then kick off SCT from the shell. > >> Any log? > > If you are interested, see: > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Z-gvW2UC4J2dzvwMLacOyNjqcbiSyHEO/view?usp=sharing > > But digging into it is not a good idea. We'd better get fresh run > of SCT with the latest U-Boot. > >> How much time does it take to run one test? >> Is there any test which exceed 20s? > > Sorry, I have no statistics. > > -Takahiro Akashi > >> Thanks, >> Michal >> >> On 09. 04. 19 7:22, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: >>> On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 07:42:46PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote: >>>> Hi Udit, >>>> >>>> We talked about testing. We generally agreed that UEFI-SCT is important, >>>> even though it is limited. LuvOS (which includes UEFI-SCT) is a good >>>> candidate to do more complete testing, and we also talked about getting >>>> UEFI test cases into the U-Boot CI testing. >>> >>> Just FYI, it was last July that I ran UEFI SCT with U-Boot on qemu. >>> Here is a summary of the result: >>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17e45yojM2nLdRovx0gcgHIAmvv9b_yc9iIUjZ2LY22c/edit?usp=sharing >>> (Please note that this is not for public review, but just informative.) >>> >>> In my experience, I saw lots of failure cases (some or most of them >>> are trivial and can be duplicated ones though), and running through >>> all the test cases took a whole week. This is partly because SCT crashes >>> occasionally and I needed to restart it next morning :) >>> >>> So I'm not sure that U-Boot UEFI is ready for automated testing with SCT. >>> (We made lots of improvements recently, but I have had no time to re-run >>> SCT these days. Give me a fast machine :) >>> >>> -Takahiro Akashi >>> >>>> Linaro LEDGE is looking at adding U-Boot testing to their backlog, but >>>> they don't have any engineering resources who can be assigned to the >>>> work right now. I'm also going to try and resource this from Arm. >>>> >>>> g. >>>> >>>> On 04/04/2019 16:08, Udit Kumar wrote: >>>>> Hi Grant >>>>> >>>>>>> - other business >>>>> >>>>> See, if you can add compliance test suits for EBBR, or subset of >>>>> UEFI-SCT is enough ? >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> >>>>> Udit >>>>> >>>>> *From:* [email protected] >>>>> <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Grant Likely >>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 3, 2019 12:49 PM >>>>> *To:* Dong Wei <[email protected]>; Eric FINCO <[email protected]>; >>>>> Robert Oshana <[email protected]>; Tony Wu <[email protected]>; >>>>> [email protected]; arm.ebbr-discuss >>>>> <[email protected]>; LEDGE SC <[email protected]>; Varis, Pekka >>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] EBBR SC meeting on-site at Connect >>>>> >>>>> Agenda for today: >>>>> >>>>> - EBBR v1.0 released (yay!) >>>>> >>>>> - goals for v1.1 or v2.0 >>>>> >>>>> - other issues >>>>> >>>>> - secure world interfaces >>>>> >>>>> - non-block storage >>>>> >>>>> - identification of protected blocks >>>>> >>>>> - other business >>>>> >>>>> --- >>>>> >>>>> Grant Likely >>>>> >>>>> Sr. Technical Director SW Engineering >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> *From:*Grant Likely >>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 3, 2019 1:49:23 PM >>>>> *To:* Dong Wei; Eric FINCO; [email protected]; Tony Wu; >>>>> [email protected]; arm.ebbr-discuss; LEDGE SC; Varis, >>>>> Pekka >>>>> *Subject:* Re: EBBR SC meeting on-site at Connect >>>>> >>>>> details for those who had trouble with the calendar invite: >>>>> >>>>> Room: Lotus 5-6 >>>>> >>>>> Time: 5:00pm >>>>> >>>>> Sorry for those of you who aren’t here. I’m not going to have a dial in, >>>>> but I’ll take good notes. >>>>> >>>>> g. >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> boot-architecture mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Arm.ebbr-discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> >> _______________________________________________ boot-architecture mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture
