Hi, how do you run it? Any log? How much time does it take to run one test? Is there any test which exceed 20s?
Thanks, Michal On 09. 04. 19 7:22, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 07:42:46PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote: >> Hi Udit, >> >> We talked about testing. We generally agreed that UEFI-SCT is important, >> even though it is limited. LuvOS (which includes UEFI-SCT) is a good >> candidate to do more complete testing, and we also talked about getting >> UEFI test cases into the U-Boot CI testing. > > Just FYI, it was last July that I ran UEFI SCT with U-Boot on qemu. > Here is a summary of the result: > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17e45yojM2nLdRovx0gcgHIAmvv9b_yc9iIUjZ2LY22c/edit?usp=sharing > (Please note that this is not for public review, but just informative.) > > In my experience, I saw lots of failure cases (some or most of them > are trivial and can be duplicated ones though), and running through > all the test cases took a whole week. This is partly because SCT crashes > occasionally and I needed to restart it next morning :) > > So I'm not sure that U-Boot UEFI is ready for automated testing with SCT. > (We made lots of improvements recently, but I have had no time to re-run > SCT these days. Give me a fast machine :) > > -Takahiro Akashi > >> Linaro LEDGE is looking at adding U-Boot testing to their backlog, but >> they don't have any engineering resources who can be assigned to the >> work right now. I'm also going to try and resource this from Arm. >> >> g. >> >> On 04/04/2019 16:08, Udit Kumar wrote: >>> Hi Grant >>> >>>>> - other business >>> >>> See, if you can add compliance test suits for EBBR, or subset of >>> UEFI-SCT is enough ? >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Udit >>> >>> *From:* [email protected] >>> <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Grant Likely >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 3, 2019 12:49 PM >>> *To:* Dong Wei <[email protected]>; Eric FINCO <[email protected]>; >>> Robert Oshana <[email protected]>; Tony Wu <[email protected]>; >>> [email protected]; arm.ebbr-discuss >>> <[email protected]>; LEDGE SC <[email protected]>; Varis, Pekka >>> <[email protected]> >>> *Subject:* Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] EBBR SC meeting on-site at Connect >>> >>> Agenda for today: >>> >>> - EBBR v1.0 released (yay!) >>> >>> - goals for v1.1 or v2.0 >>> >>> - other issues >>> >>> - secure world interfaces >>> >>> - non-block storage >>> >>> - identification of protected blocks >>> >>> - other business >>> >>> --- >>> >>> Grant Likely >>> >>> Sr. Technical Director SW Engineering >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> *From:*Grant Likely >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 3, 2019 1:49:23 PM >>> *To:* Dong Wei; Eric FINCO; [email protected]; Tony Wu; >>> [email protected]; arm.ebbr-discuss; LEDGE SC; Varis, Pekka >>> *Subject:* Re: EBBR SC meeting on-site at Connect >>> >>> details for those who had trouble with the calendar invite: >>> >>> Room: Lotus 5-6 >>> >>> Time: 5:00pm >>> >>> Sorry for those of you who aren’t here. I’m not going to have a dial in, >>> but I’ll take good notes. >>> >>> g. >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> boot-architecture mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture > _______________________________________________ > Arm.ebbr-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ boot-architecture mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture
