On 1/5/10 3:19 PM, Mridul Muralidharan wrote: > > --- On Wed, 6/1/10, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From: Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [BOSH] default port? >> To: "Bidirectional Streams Over Synchronous HTTP" <[email protected]> >> Date: Wednesday, 6 January, 2010, 3:44 AM >> On 1/5/10 3:12 PM, Mridul >> Muralidharan wrote: >> >>> Usually, same origin client side constraints apply : >> so the bosh >>> client artifacts would anyway need to be served off >> that port - >>> making it a 'full fledged' http instance. >>> >>> As opposed to services on top of http (rest, soap, >> etc) - which is >>> where ietf tries to split (iirc), things are slightly >> more involved >>> in this case probably. >> I'm confused. How do same origin policies mandate port 80? > > > > It does not mandate port 80. > If we say port xyz is for BOSH - then the client artifacts should also come > from the same port xyz (js files, etc - xhr constraints iirc).
If client artifacts come from the server, sure. That's not always the case for BOSH clients. > So the port is not restricted to servicing only bosh requests, but also > general http serving requests. Some HTTP serving requests, yes -- I don't know if I'd call it "general" (no one is going to host a website at port 5280 just for fun). Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
