What ?

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 01:36:15PM +0100, Simon de Vlieger wrote:
> Is this the socket connection for the urwid on top of Twisted thing?
>
> On 22 mrt 2010, at 11:27, Bob Farrell wrote:
>
>> We're working on it ...
>>
>> It's on the to-do list, and has been for a long time. It might happen 
>> one day.
>> :-)
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 09:13:34PM -0700, fisadev wrote:
>>> Hello everybody, I'm new here.
>>>
>>> Talking about Vim, when I saw bpython my first thought was "OMG, I
>>> need this inside Vim, not omnicomplete".
>>> Is that possible?
>>>
>>> On Feb 16, 8:24 am, Bob Farrell <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi, thanks everyone for the feedback here - I'd be interested to  
>>>> hear what
>>>> Andreas has to say about this too.
>>>>
>>>> So, instead of replying to you all individually, I'm just going to  
>>>> give my
>>>> general thoughts on what the mails have led me to.
>>>>
>>>> Basically, I'm a lot more interested in this than I was yesterday.  
>>>> Simon
>>>> mentioned the block editing feature which I agree would be a  
>>>> really great thing
>>>> to have. I think this depends at least partly on Marien's work on  
>>>> the urwid
>>>> front-end. If we can get rid of curses then implementing this  
>>>> should be a whole
>>>> lot easier, so maybe a GSoC programmer could do some general house- 
>>>> keeping;
>>>> helping with getting half-finished ideas completed and also take  
>>>> on tasks such
>>>> as block editing.
>>>>
>>>> So, I'll take a look at the application form today and see what I  
>>>> think.
>>>>
>>>> If anyone has any suggestions for features, now is a good time to  
>>>> mention them.
>>>>
>>>> Re: the poster who mentioned bpython evolving into an IDE, well,  
>>>> personally I'm
>>>> not too sure about this. It would take a hell of a lot to convince  
>>>> me to stop
>>>> usingvimas my text editor and personally I just don't see the  
>>>> point in trying
>>>> to create text-editing features in bpython when there are already  
>>>> such powerful
>>>> text editors around.
>>>>
>>>> But, I do think bpython being a part of another IDE would be great  
>>>> for a lot of
>>>> people. I forget the name of the project, but there is an IDE that  
>>>> embeds
>>>> existing tools such asvimand essentially outsources its  
>>>> components. The gtk
>>>> port of bpython would allow bpython to be used with this project.
>>>>
>>>> Also the suggestion we had yesterday of having a socket server run  
>>>> inside
>>>> bpython that can run code sent to it from e.g.vimis a great idea -  
>>>> Marien is
>>>> doing some work with Twisted and bpython that would make this  
>>>> trivial to
>>>> implement, so we would have slime-like 
>>>> (http://common-lisp.net/project/slime/)
>>>> functionality.
>>>>
>>>> So there are definitely plenty of things we can do to improve  
>>>> bpython and I
>>>> don't want to be the one who ruins the party by not applying to  
>>>> GSoC if it
>>>> means we could end up having a better tool for everyone.
>>>>
>>>> I'll post back here with my progress.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks also to those who have said nice words about the project;  
>>>> it's always a
>>>> pleasure to hear that others find my work useful.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 05:02:08AM +0530, Shashwat Anand wrote:
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>>> I would also like to respond to the publicity issue raised by  
>>>>>> Anand. I am
>>>>>> the maintainer of both the bpaste.net and bpython- 
>>>>>> interpreter.org domains.
>>>>>> bpython-interpreter.org has had 13 000 visitors and 2 500  
>>>>>> downloads of the
>>>>>> archive file hosted on the website. For the current month we  
>>>>>> average about
>>>>>> 350 visitors daily. A search on Twitter reveals a lot of people 
>>>>>> chattering
>>>>>> about and we get picked up on quite a few weblogs. Now, I am 
>>>>>> not saying
>>>>>> there is no room for improvement but I am saying that we do not 
>>>>>> need GSoC
>>>>>> for publicity. If Bob decides we could try to participate it  
>>>>>> should be for a
>>>>>> chunk of development power and not for a chunk of publicity.
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for stating the statistics of which I was unaware of. It  
>>>>> did cleared
>>>>> a lot of issues. I agree upon the fact that if bpython decided to
>>>>> participate it should be for chunk of development power and not for
>>>>> publicity. But I still believe that assessing the pros and cons by
>>>>> participating once, bpython can decide upon future participation.
>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> ~Shashwat Anand (l0nwlf)
>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the  
>>>>> Google Groups "bpython" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit this group 
>>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/bpython?hl=en.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Bob Farrell
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
>>> Groups "bpython" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/bpython?hl=en.
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Bob Farrell
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
>> Groups "bpython" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/bpython?hl=en.
>>
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "bpython" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/bpython?hl=en.
>

-- 
Bob Farrell

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"bpython" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/bpython?hl=en.

Reply via email to