Marienz told us that implementing the socket (which is needed for IPC
between VIM and bpython) is really easy because of urwid when it runs
on a twisted-mainloop.
Or it was someone else, I'm pretty sure I heard about it!
On 22 mrt 2010, at 14:22, Bob Farrell wrote:
What ?
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 01:36:15PM +0100, Simon de Vlieger wrote:
Is this the socket connection for the urwid on top of Twisted thing?
On 22 mrt 2010, at 11:27, Bob Farrell wrote:
We're working on it ...
It's on the to-do list, and has been for a long time. It might
happen
one day.
:-)
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 09:13:34PM -0700, fisadev wrote:
Hello everybody, I'm new here.
Talking about Vim, when I saw bpython my first thought was "OMG, I
need this inside Vim, not omnicomplete".
Is that possible?
On Feb 16, 8:24 am, Bob Farrell
<[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi, thanks everyone for the feedback here - I'd be interested to
hear what
Andreas has to say about this too.
So, instead of replying to you all individually, I'm just going to
give my
general thoughts on what the mails have led me to.
Basically, I'm a lot more interested in this than I was yesterday.
Simon
mentioned the block editing feature which I agree would be a
really great thing
to have. I think this depends at least partly on Marien's work on
the urwid
front-end. If we can get rid of curses then implementing this
should be a whole
lot easier, so maybe a GSoC programmer could do some general
house-
keeping;
helping with getting half-finished ideas completed and also take
on tasks such
as block editing.
So, I'll take a look at the application form today and see what I
think.
If anyone has any suggestions for features, now is a good time to
mention them.
Re: the poster who mentioned bpython evolving into an IDE, well,
personally I'm
not too sure about this. It would take a hell of a lot to convince
me to stop
usingvimas my text editor and personally I just don't see the
point in trying
to create text-editing features in bpython when there are already
such powerful
text editors around.
But, I do think bpython being a part of another IDE would be great
for a lot of
people. I forget the name of the project, but there is an IDE that
embeds
existing tools such asvimand essentially outsources its
components. The gtk
port of bpython would allow bpython to be used with this project.
Also the suggestion we had yesterday of having a socket server run
inside
bpython that can run code sent to it from e.g.vimis a great idea -
Marien is
doing some work with Twisted and bpython that would make this
trivial to
implement, so we would have slime-like
(http://common-lisp.net/project/slime/)
functionality.
So there are definitely plenty of things we can do to improve
bpython and I
don't want to be the one who ruins the party by not applying to
GSoC if it
means we could end up having a better tool for everyone.
I'll post back here with my progress.
Thanks also to those who have said nice words about the project;
it's always a
pleasure to hear that others find my work useful.
Thanks,
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 05:02:08AM +0530, Shashwat Anand wrote:
<snip>
I would also like to respond to the publicity issue raised by
Anand. I am
the maintainer of both the bpaste.net and bpython-
interpreter.org domains.
bpython-interpreter.org has had 13 000 visitors and 2 500
downloads of the
archive file hosted on the website. For the current month we
average about
350 visitors daily. A search on Twitter reveals a lot of people
chattering
about and we get picked up on quite a few weblogs. Now, I am
not saying
there is no room for improvement but I am saying that we do not
need GSoC
for publicity. If Bob decides we could try to participate it
should be for a
chunk of development power and not for a chunk of publicity.
Thanks for stating the statistics of which I was unaware of. It
did cleared
a lot of issues. I agree upon the fact that if bpython decided to
participate it should be for chunk of development power and not
for
publicity. But I still believe that assessing the pros and cons
by
participating once, bpython can decide upon future participation.
Regards,
~Shashwat Anand (l0nwlf)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Google Groups "bpython" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group
athttp://groups.google.com/group/bpython?hl=en.
--
Bob Farrell
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "bpython" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bpython?hl=en.
--
Bob Farrell
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "bpython" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bpython?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "bpython" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpython?hl=en
.
--
Bob Farrell
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "bpython" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpython?hl=en
.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"bpython" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/bpython?hl=en.
