I totatlly agree with you Terry, thanks for bringing this up, cause I too
feel the same way.
Armando
----- Original Message -----
From: "Terri Pannett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alice Dampman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 9:11 AM
Subject: Re: [Braillenote] planned techno failure
Alice,
The blind are forced to pay mor than the sighted for cell phones as well
as notetakers. I bought a MotorolaQ and the MSS SmartPhone and I had it
installed and paid a fee for that. I wanted complete accessibility which
the LG phones don't have. This phone is supposed to last me for two years
and it had better last!
Accessibility and small market is why we have to pay more. HW knows that
for most of us speech alone isn't the answer--we need a braille display
because braille is the preferred reading and editing mode. They think
we'll lie down quietly and plunk out more money for a new display, but
they should think again. People aren't going to spend money for a display
every year or two. I bought my transplant in 2005 and it's too soon to
buy another display.
Terri Amateur Radio call sign KF6CA.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alice Dampman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 3:05 AM
Subject: [Braillenote] planned techno failure
Maurice,
You wrote:
"People do have an unrealistic expectation of how long you should be able
to service something. I'm not a heavy mobile phone user, but I'm onto my
5th phone and in most instances I've got a new phone because the old
phone
just couldn't be serviced, and if I wanted some new feature then I payed
for a new phone."
So humanware will also become part of our throw-away culture? And anyhow,
a cell phone costs $100 or thereabouts, unless of course you choose to
get a more expensive one with more bells and whistles. But one has no
choice in the price of these note takers, and the idea of spending $6000
every 5 years or so to replace the Braille Note is unacceptable and
indicates to me that the machines are not very well made. It's not only a
matter of new technology, it's a matter of duragbility, stability and
adaptability.
In short, these things are simply too expensive to require such
frequent replacement. Can you imagine the outrage if drivers were forced
to replace their cars every 5 years?
Alice
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Replies to this message will go directly to the sender.
If your reply would be useful to the list, please send a
copy to the list as well.
To leave the BrailleNote list, send a blank message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To view the list archives or change your preferences, visit
http://list.humanware.com/mailman/listinfo/braillenote
__________ NOD32 2708 (20071207) Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
___
Replies to this message will go directly to the sender.
If your reply would be useful to the list, please send a
copy to the list as well.
To leave the BrailleNote list, send a blank message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To view the list archives or change your preferences, visit
http://list.humanware.com/mailman/listinfo/braillenote
___
Replies to this message will go directly to the sender.
If your reply would be useful to the list, please send a
copy to the list as well.
To leave the BrailleNote list, send a blank message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To view the list archives or change your preferences, visit
http://list.humanware.com/mailman/listinfo/braillenote
