At 23:03 03-01-01 -0500,  "John D. Giorgis" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Ronn's amusing response aside, John, I would say that premarital sex is about 
as accepted as can be . . . even many Catholics I know have only mixed feelings 
about it, mostly related to responsibility and disease and unwanted pregnancy; 
all of those same Catholics I know are in favour of birth control. *grin* 

You're probably confused about how I mean "conservative", though, and 
understandably (though it's sad that the word seems not to be usable outside or 
a partisan context anymore).

>I don't buy this at all........  there is an awful lot of sleeping around
>on Star Trek.   

Um, John. There is an awful lot of sleeping around in our world. :) *shrug*

>Premarital sex is virtually accepted.   

Whereas in our world, if you do that you end up wandering the village with a 
red "S" on your blouse or get hanged, right? Again, I'd say premarital sex is 
not seen as abnormal in our culture.

>Abortion is completely accepted.   

This is being discussed elsewhere. The only note I want to add is that the 
justification of abortion as a defense against unprovoked attack is one of the 
weaker but still sometimes used standard arguments in defense of abortion 
justified by context. I read a few essays that used the metaphor of unprooked 
attack directly. But I didn't see the episode and it seems to be disputed how 
much the procedure is "completely accepted". I would say one instance in one 
program isn't evidence of this. I also think if they actually used abortion 
regularly it would be a colossally badly imagined future --  as if we will 
figure out warp drives and FTL but not figure out more effective means of birth 
control --  gimme a break.

>Sleeping with co-workers is completely accepted.

I have a lot to say about this below.

>All of these represent significant changes.

Changes from *what*? This really looks a lot like the world we're living in, no 
matter how your or my behaviours or values differ from them (except maybe the 
coworkers thing, see below). BTW: how often have abortions happened on ST 
programs? I can't imagine them happening THAT much.

One thing I should clear up . . . when I said "conservative", Joshua correctly 
noted that ST characters seem to have little or no problem with premarital sex. 
I should clarify what I meant by conservative: I didn't really mean 
conservative like I would call John conservative, I just meant not all that far 
from what's accepted by the median of Westerners these days. ie. somewhere in 
between the far left and the far right of what I guess we could call "sexual 
politics", somewhere between chastity-belts/no-sex-ed and leather-'n'-
bondage/orgies, there's an average contemporary point of view about sex and 
sexuality which I think has not a lot of problems with something like 
premartial sex, birth control, and *maybe* sleeping with co-workers (ahem, 
especially when you're on a spaceship and EVERYONE is a co-worker). The fact 
that I've seen people inquiring about whether to pursue a relationship at work 
in advice columns [1] several times says that our society does not have any 
universal, hard-and-fast guidelines about it (though most columnists I've read 
advise against it, usually for the same reasons --  but see below for why I 
think this is a special case in the ST universe as we've seen it). 

In those terms, when I say "conservative" I just mean, not all that far off 
imaginatively, not all that innovative or different, from the generally 
accepted mainstream point of view in Western culture today --  except, perhaps, 
in its ambivalence about homosexuality which is expressed in its repeated 
failure to approach the issue overtly. A conservative extrapolation of 
transportation would be peopl driving cars in 2030, as opposed to one in which 
people are driving heavily armed hovercars running off fission. The depiction 
of sexual politics that persistently omits homosexuality in Star Trek arguably 
does or doesn't reflect a parallel lack of enlightenment in the mainstream 
point of view that I think ST tries to adhere to. (I don't think my circle of 
friends, which includes some homosexuals and a lot of people who are very 
supportive of those friends and the issues they face generally, is a good 
sample group by which I can attempt to judge the mainstream point of view, 
which probably varies from region to region. But optimistically the best I can 
say is I think while things are improving, I think the bulk of people I know 
are unfortunately happier and more comfortable not thinking about the issues 
even if they are not overtly anti-homosexual. And that's me being perhaps 
overly optimistic. But I am far from expert on the subject in any case, and I 
don't want to deign to try speak for anyone else who might have more informed 
points to make than mine.)

By the way, there is one exceptional issue I'd raise: sleeping with co-workers. 
*evil grin* I'd like to see Starfleet command actually try to outlaw sex with 
co-workers on ships that go on long exploring missions. Wasn't that the basis 
of 3 of 4 major Star Trek programs? I know that on ST:TNG they weren't as cut 
off from their society, but in all, there was an intensely isolated sense of 
things as I recall. Hahaha. You can't even completely stop self-described 
heterosexuals from having sex by segregating males from females (such as, say, 
in jail, though of course that's kinda different... kinda). In fact, it's 
conceviable that Federation conceives of relationships in the ranks the way the 
Spartans did, and use it to more tightly weave the crew together and give them 
a reason to really struggle for the good of the group. And maybe with less 
hangups and individual neuroses, and better mental health generally throughout 
the society, the fact that most of those relationships would eventually 
dissolve might cause the crew to be saturated with powerful bonds of affection 
and closeness rather than fractured by division. *shrug* Now that might be 
interesting. But it's hard to say... That's more pure speculation on my part.

Less spectulatively, one could declare it a law of human nature: People are 
very likely to have sex, generally. (Well, except the people I meet, *grumble*) 
So when you stick them on a spaceship, and isolate them on it, it takes very 
little imagination to figure out with whom they will be having this sex. 
*shrug* It's as good a reason as any.

[1] For some reason I like reading advice columns... Does anyone else have this 
strange curiosity about what issues worry people so much that they're willing 
to ask a stranger for advice?

Reply via email to