You are ALL WRONG!!!

If we are talking about Centigrade being ideal because of the Zero thing you
soooo wrong. 
Basing a system on when water freezes and boils is ludicrous, because these
values fluctuate based upon air pressure. At 30 PSI, water boils at 160
Degrees F (or around there, something like that). Anyone care to translate
that for the Fahrenheit-challenged?

The IDEAL and most rational scale is, of course, Kelvin. Astrophysicists use
it, and so can you!

Nerd From Hell

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darryl Shannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 8:27 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Objectionable material for children
> 
> 
> John, I'm shocked that you would claim that Farhenheit is better than
> Centigrade.  No, No NO!
> 
> Centigrade is best because of one fact.  Zero degrees.  Face 
> facts, you
> lose.  No possible argument can be advanced that will make Farhenheit
> superior when placed against that simple fact.  And it is a very
> important fact (At least in northern North America, perhaps 
> not so much
> in .br).  Is it snowing?  Are the puddles frozen?  ZERO.  Say it! 
> ZEEEE-RO!  Not Thirty-two, that MAKES NO SENSE.
> 
> Oh, I can hear you say, "But with Fahrenheit we get more precision!" 
> Bzzzzzt!  Wrong!  Sure, one degree C is two degrees F.  But so what? 
> When they predict the weather, or when they report the 
> weather, what is
> meaningful?  They say, "High seventies" or even "In the Fifties". 
> Which means that meaningful temperatures are given in blocks 
> of 5 or 10
> degrees!
> 
> And no, no one says, "Huh, the thermometer says 71F, but it feels like
> 72F."  No, your body cannot make such fine distinctions.  And if you
> need to, say hello to our friend the decimal system!  Y'know, 
> 28.3 and such-like?
> 
> =====
> 
> 
> 
> Darryl
> 
> Think Galactically --  Act Terrestrially
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices. 
> http://auctions.yahoo.com/
> 

Reply via email to