On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, John D. Giorgis wrote:
> At 08:26 AM 1/23/01 -0800, Darry; wrote:
> >Centigrade is best because of one fact. Zero degrees. Face facts, you
> >lose. No possible argument can be advanced that will make Farhenheit
> >superior when placed against that simple fact. And it is a very
> >important fact (At least in northern North America, perhaps not so much
> >in .br). Is it snowing? Are the puddles frozen? ZERO.
>
> Yeah, but Darryl you completely miss the point - we are talking about
> useful things here for everyday life, not in science classes. In this
> case, Farenheit has the simple superior fact that when it hits zero
> degrees it is actually *cold* outside!
Well, when it hits 0C, I call it "cold"!
Julia
p.s. either way, if you want me to get out of bed in the morning, do NOT
inform me that it is -22 outside, thank you very much!
- Re: Objectionable material for childre... Charlie Bell
- Re: Objectionable material for chi... Andrea Leistra
- Re: Objectionable material for... Charlie Bell
- Re: Objectionable materia... Ronn Blankenship
- Deadly temperatures? Re: ... Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
- Re: Objectionable material for childre... Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Objectionable material for children Julia Thompson
- Re: Objectionable material for children K Street
- Re: Objectionable material for childre... John D. Giorgis
- Re: Objectionable material for children John D. Giorgis
- Re: Objectionable material for children Julia Thompson
- Re: Objectionable material for childre... Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Objectionable material for childre... Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Objectionable material for childre... John D. Giorgis
- Re: Objectionable material for chi... dendriite
- Temperature Extremes Re: Objec... John D. Giorgis
- Re: Temperature Extremes ... Marvin Long, Jr.
- Re: Temperature Extremes ... Julia Thompson
- Re: Temperature Extremes ... Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Objectionable material for chi... Julia Thompson
- Temperature Extremes Re: Objec... John D. Giorgis
