[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Again, why? > >Jeroen, you don't get to practice being the two year old *now*. You >have to practice the parental lines. Friends who have the special >DNA sequence that parents seem to get at the birth of a child have >my favorite response...... after two "becauses" for two "whys"...... >"because <mommy/daddy/control figure of choice> is on a power trip" My plan for our as-yet hypothetical child(ren) is to answer "why?" with an excrutiatingly exacting answer (and a trip to the library or web if necessary). When I do that to Susan she usually bops me on the head. Anyone have annecdotes about trying that approach with kids? Joshua _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
- Re: Objectionable material for children Charlie Bell
- Re: Objectionable material for children John D. Giorgis
- Re: Objectionable material for children Erik Reuter
- Heat in Space Re: Objectionable material for... John D. Giorgis
- Re: Heat in Space Re: Objectionable mate... Andrew Crystall
- Re: Heat in Space Re: Objectionable... Doug Pensinger
- Re: Objectionable material for children Doug Pensinger
- Campaign Finance Reform Re: Objectionable ma... John D. Giorgis
- Objectionable material for children Darryl Shannon
- Re: Objectionable material for children Charlie Bell
- Re: Objectionable material for children Joshua Bell
- Re: Objectionable material for children Joshua Bell
- Re: Objectionable material for children Julia Thompson
- Re: Objectionable Material for Children Alberto Monteiro
- Re: Objectionable Material for Children Julia Thompson
- Re: Objectionable Material for Children Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Objectionable Material for Children Charlie Bell
- Re: Objectionable Material for Children Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Objectionable Material for Children Charlie Bell
- Re: Objectionable Material for Chil... Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Objectionable Material for Chil... dendriite
