"John D. Giorgis" wrote:
>
> At 10:42 AM 12/2/00 -0500, Yanni wrote:
> >Bull honkey. There may be 3rd parties, but there are only ever 2
> >candidates, and I don't see that changing anytime soon. And McCain,
> >Bradley and Forbes didn't have a snowballs chance in heck of winning.
> >Your faith in the sham america calls a democratic system amuses me
> >immensely.
>
> Why is the candidates' chance of winning so important? Shouldn't
> candidates that do not have the support of nearly 50%+ of the populus *not*
> have a chance of winning?
Not if they are more capable then the popular candidate.
--
I cannot count them in a box I cannot count them with a fox
I cannot count them by computer I will not with a Roto-Rooter
I cannot count them card-by-card I will not 'cause it's way too hard
I cannot count them on my fingers I will not while suspicion lingers.
I'll leave the country in a jam I can't count ballots, Sam-I-Am.
