> Thus, the woman is forced with the choice:
> a) Abort the child
> b) Accept $1 million and a 1/3rd chance that her child will be the slave
of
> a Hollywood producer, having an otherwise comfortable life.
>
> My problem is that if you think that a woman has a right to do "A", how
can
> you argue that she does not have the right to do "B."
>
> JDG

If adoption by a corporation is allowed (which it might well be), fine.
There is nothing wrong with "B". As long as no other laws are being broken
during the raising of the child (which is the main point in Truman, how far
can you delude someone before you're actually impinging on their rights?)
then there can be no issue with "B" at all.

I'm going to stay away from "A".

Charlie

Reply via email to