> Thus, the woman is forced with the choice: > a) Abort the child > b) Accept $1 million and a 1/3rd chance that her child will be the slave of > a Hollywood producer, having an otherwise comfortable life. > > My problem is that if you think that a woman has a right to do "A", how can > you argue that she does not have the right to do "B." > > JDG If adoption by a corporation is allowed (which it might well be), fine. There is nothing wrong with "B". As long as no other laws are being broken during the raising of the child (which is the main point in Truman, how far can you delude someone before you're actually impinging on their rights?) then there can be no issue with "B" at all. I'm going to stay away from "A". Charlie
- [Abortion] The Truman Show John D. Giorgis
- Re: [Abortion] The Truman Show Alberto Monteiro
- Re: [Abortion] The Truman Show John D. Giorgis
- Re: [Abortion] The Truman Show Charlie Bell
- Re: [Abortion] The Truman Show John D. Giorgis
- Re: [Abortion] The Truman... Charlie Bell
- Re: [Abortion] The Truman Show TomFODW
- Re: [Abortion] The Truman Show John D. Giorgis
- Re: The Truman Show Charlie Bell
- Re: The Truman Show John D. Giorgis
- Re: The Truman Show Charlie Bell
- Child soldiers was, R... Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
- Re: The Truman Show Julia Thompson
- Re: [Abortion] The Truman Show Erik Reuter
- Re: [Abortion] The Truman Show John D. Giorgis
- Re: [Abortion] The Truman Show Jeffrey Miller
- Re: [Abortion] The Truman Show Alberto Monteiro
- Re: [Abortion] The Truman Show John D. Giorgis
- Re: [Abortion] The Truman Show Dan Minette
