At 18:06 09-03-01 -0800, Christopher Gwyn wrote:
>         <chuckle> So? You have access to powerful digital equipment - that
>makes you a potential criminal in the eyes of the RIAA and MPAA, a
>criminal which their poor helpless profits must be protected against.
>('their profits', not 'the artist's profits')


The same way that my having access to a firearm makes me a potential 
criminal in the eyes of people like Sarah Brady?


-- Ronn!  :)


Reply via email to