At 18:06 09-03-01 -0800, Christopher Gwyn wrote:
> <chuckle> So? You have access to powerful digital equipment - that
>makes you a potential criminal in the eyes of the RIAA and MPAA, a
>criminal which their poor helpless profits must be protected against.
>('their profits', not 'the artist's profits')
The same way that my having access to a firearm makes me a potential
criminal in the eyes of people like Sarah Brady?
-- Ronn! :)
- Re: skip commercials, was... John D. Giorgis
- Re: skip commercials, was Re: ... J. van Baardwijk
- Re: skip commercials, was Re: Musi... Ronn Blankenship
- Re: skip commercials, was Re: ... Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
- Re: Music - is fair use dead? Christopher Gwyn
- Commercials and cars Kevin Tarr
- Re: Commercials and cars Matthew and Julie Bos
- Re: Commercials and cars Kevin Tarr
- Re: Commercials and cars Matthew and Julie Bos
- Re: Commercials and c... Julia Thompson
- Re: Flame bait (was Re: Music - is fair us... Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Flame bait (was Re: Music - is fai... Christopher Gwyn
- Re: Flame bait (was Re: Music - is... Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Music - is fair use dead? Alberto Monteiro
- Re: Music - is fair use dead? Christopher Gwyn
- Re: Music - is fair use dead? Kristin A. Ruhle
- Re: Music - is fair use dead? Christopher Gwyn
- Re: Music - is fair use dead? Alberto Monteiro
