"John D. Giorgis" wrote: > > Even if global warming is happening, and even if human beings are > responsible - there is almost no evidence that drastic measures must be > taken immediately to save the world. IMHO, a much more moderate approach > is definitely called for. > Can you really be so certain, John? Are you sure that we aren't initiating a chain of events that, once it's reached a certain point, becomes catastrophic beyond our control? Wouldn't the conservative approach be to err on the side of caution? In the long run, what do we have to loose by being cautious? Doug [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: W. on the Environment J. van Baardwijk
- Re: W. on the Environment Marvin Long, Jr.
- Re: W. on the Environment camplate
- Re: W. on the Environment Matt Grimaldi
- Re: W. on the Environment John D. Giorgis
- Re: W. on the Environment camplate
- Re: W. on the Environment K. Feete
- Re: W. on the Environment Julia Thompson
- Re: W. on the Environment Ronn Blankenship
- Re: W. on the Environment John D. Giorgis
- Re: W. on the Environment Doug Pensinger
- Re: W. on the Environment camplate
- Re: W. on the Environment Ronn Blankenship
- News Sources Re: W. on the Environment John D. Giorgis
- Re: News Sources Re: W. on the Environment Ronn Blankenship
- Re: News Sources Re: W. on the Environme... John D. Giorgis
- Re: W. on the Environment Dan Minette
- Re: W. on the Environment Doug Pensinger
- W. on the Environment Darryl Shannon
- Re: W. on the Environment Ronn Blankenship
- Re: W. on the Environment Doug Pensinger
