----- Original Message -----
From: "Kristin A. Ruhle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 7:59 PM
Subject: Re: kvetching about posts
> Oh, i'm sorry...(altho I think that was copyrighted content, and Dawkins
> and/or the Guardian would not have appreciated people passing it around, I
> don't think arnyone is goingto get sued.) i mean,I must have really come
> across like a sourpuss and a wet blanket. Didn't mean too. WEll the
> "Libertarian Futurist" AFAIK is kinda one of those "rules are for
> breaking" outfits (go to a Worldcon and read that crazy Frefanzine
> whatshisname puts out. I mean, they call Greg Bear a Libertarian - people
> misreading Moving Mars as being Moon is a Harsh Mistress over again. I
> know he calls *himself* a liberal, I've read enough of his work to know
> what he really thinks of so called "rugged individualists "and he's
> probably the least libertarian ofthe Killer Bees, but i can's speak for
> him (ask him yourself) and this is a dumb digression). anyway, they're the
> kind who really would repost things willy nilly without anybody's
> permission, just cause they can.
>
> rambling rant cum apology - ho'wd that happen?
>
No apology necessary between friends, just some understanding, right!:)
My take was that there are a lot of people of various beliefs that really
liked Adams work. He reached a broad audience successfully.
For me, it made his work all the more impressive.
xponent
rob
