"John D. Giorgis" wrote: > > That's changing the debate. I'm not arguing whether we *should* be > arrogant, or whether it is *just* that we are arrogant. I'm just arguing > that there are *reasons* for being arrogant. There might be reasons for arrogance, but none of them are any good, IMO. Doug
- Re: American Attitudes Dan Minette
- Re: American Attitudes K.Feete
- Re: American Attitudes Russell Chapman
- Re: American Attitudes K.Feete
- Re: American Attitudes John D. Giorgis
- Re: American Attitudes Marvin Long, Jr.
- Re: American Attitudes Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
- RE: American Attitudes Gautam Mukunda
- Re: American Attitudes Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
- Re: American Attitudes Dan Minette
- Re: (long post) world wars / American ... Doug Pensinger
- Re: (long post) world wars / American ... Mark Salkeld
- RE: (long post) world wars / Ameri... Charlie Bell
- Re: (long post) world wars / A... Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
- Re: introductions ... Mark Salkeld
- Re: introductions ... Jeffrey Miller
- Re: introductions ... Adam C. Lipscomb
- Re: introductions ... Jeffrey Miller
- Re: introductions ... Steve Sloan
- Re: introductions ... John D. Giorgis
- Re: (long post) world wars / Ameri... Jeffrey Miller
