>
> > How do you know this is true? there re so many crazy rumors going around,
> > and they'll probably never let on what was really happening - saying the
> > shooting was an "accident," indeed! (Oh, he thought it was a toy but it
> > was a REAL MACHINE GUN! And it just went off when he was playing with
> > it! Bang bang bang until EVERYBODY was dead! Puh-leeeeze.....)
>
> Careful, now, it sounds like you're blaming the poor innocent machine gun. After
>all, if the prince didn't have a machine gun, he would have just used some other
>weapon. Like a car. He could have run the Royal Family over with his car. Inside the
>palace ... um ... or a knife! He could have stabbed them all. All nine. Several times
>each to be sure he killed them. Before any of them ran away, or any bodyguards showed
>up to stop him, or ... um ... rocks! He could have thrown rocks at them until they
>died. Of course, that's a lot of rocks ... he could have brought them into the palace
>in a wheelbarrow ... um ... well, anyway, we can't blame the machine gun.
>
> Patrick Sweeney
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Sounds like YOU are ferociously defending the Second Amendemnt -
everyone's right to keep and bear an entire arsenal. Well I don't think
they passed that one in Nepal...
Kristin
