> How do you know this is true? there re so many crazy rumors going around,
> and they'll probably never let on what was really happening - saying the
> shooting was an "accident," indeed! (Oh, he thought it was a toy but it
> was a REAL MACHINE GUN! And it just went off when he was playing with
> it! Bang bang bang until EVERYBODY was dead! Puh-leeeeze.....)
Careful, now, it sounds like you're blaming the poor innocent machine gun. After all,
if the prince didn't have a machine gun, he would have just used some other weapon.
Like a car. He could have run the Royal Family over with his car. Inside the palace
... um ... or a knife! He could have stabbed them all. All nine. Several times each to
be sure he killed them. Before any of them ran away, or any bodyguards showed up to
stop him, or ... um ... rocks! He could have thrown rocks at them until they died. Of
course, that's a lot of rocks ... he could have brought them into the palace in a
wheelbarrow ... um ... well, anyway, we can't blame the machine gun.
Patrick Sweeney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
