At 09:55 AM 6/11/01, John wrote: > > From: John D. Giorgis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > JDG - Who sincerely hopes that this old chestnut of an argument that > > started this whole thing can finally be permanently put to rest. > >I don't buy this. If the guy had had a gun, he would have probably killed >more than 8 kids. If he had automatic weapons, he would have killed a whole >lot more than 8 kids. And he probably wouldn't have been stopped by a >teacher and a principal. Now, had the teacher or principal or both been armed . . . -- Ronn! :)
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Julia Thompson
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Science has a new Martyr William T Goodall
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Doug Pensinger
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Pat10355
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Pat10355
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Julia Thompson
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Doug Pensinger
- RE: Science has a new Martyr Horn, John
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Science has a new Martyr Dan Minette
- Re: Science has a new Martyr William T Goodall
- Re: Science has a new Martyr (and a new... dean
- Re: Science has a new Martyr (and ... Dan Minette
- gun control (newbie) Dean Forster
- Re: gun control (newbie) L3 Dan Minette
- Re: gun control (newbie) L3 Dean Forster
- Re: gun control (newbie) L3 J. van Baardwijk
- Re: gun control (newbie) L3 Ronn Blankenship
- Re: responsibility Dan Minette
