Marvin wrote: > And that is why nobody will concede that America is "great" in the sense > that you appear (as far as I can tell) to want to argue, John. Because it > means that in affairs of state, an American's needs must then be accounted > more priority and dignity than a German's needs, or an Argentinian's > needs, or an Ethiopian's needs, and that's just hogwash. Ah, brilliant. I'd like to have said that so clearly. Marvin, want a job as my official spokesman? ;o) Charlie
- The Real Threat Re: US Isolationism RE: US at war in 1940... John D. Giorgis
- Re: The Real Threat Re: US Isolationism RE: US at wa... Russell Chapman
- Re: US Isolationism RE: US at war in 1940?1942? L3 J.D. Giorgis
- RE: US Isolationism RE: US at war in 1940?1942? L3 Charlie Bell
- RE: US Isolationism RE: US at war in 1940?1942? ... J. van Baardwijk
- Re: US Isolationism RE: US at war in 1940?19... Marc Erickson
- US Senate against Kyoto Dan Minette
- RE: US Senate against Kyoto Charlie Bell
- Re: US Isolationism RE: US at war in 1940?1942? L3 J.D. Giorgis
- Greatness Marvin Long, Jr.
- Re: Greatness Charlie Bell
- Re: Greatness John D. Giorgis
- Re: Greatness Marvin Long, Jr.
- Re: Greatness Steve Sloan
- Re: Greatness John Garcia
- RE: US Isolationism RE: US at war in 1940?1942? L3 Charlie Bell
- RE: US Isolationism RE: US at war in 1940?1942? ... Ronn Blankenship
- RE: US Isolationism RE: US at war in 1940?19... Charlie Bell
- Re: Pride and Arrogance Marc Erickson
- Re: US Isolationism RE: US at war in 1940?1942? L3 J. van Baardwijk
- Re: US Isolationism RE: US at war in 1940?1942? L3 Jim Sharkey
