--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> <<You just agreed with me, you're restricting the
> rights
> of law abiding citizens. There are punishments for
> violating the law here already, lots and lots. >>
>
> But if it's against the law in the Netherlands to
> own a gun illegally, and you break the law, you
> aren't law-abiding anymore.
>
huh?
> I don't say how you can argue that one law, say,
> prohibiting murder, doesn't curtail your rights
> while another one, say, Dutch gun control law, does.
>
you are trying to make me woozy so i will be easier to
attack. =)
> Unless you say there's no right to murder but the
> Second Amendment does give you a right to own
> whatever guns you like, in which case a) I disagree
> and so does the Supreme Court, several times, and b)
> Do you know if the Dutch constitution includes such
> a right? If Jeroen doesn't have a right to own a gun
> in his country, laws restricting gun ownership
> aren't infringing on _his_ rights.
>
Man, i honestly don't understand what you're trying to
say. I already went quite thoroughly over the Supreme
Court's interpretations, i got that part.
dean
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and more.
http://buzz.yahoo.com/
