--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> <<But i'm judging you by American standards, since
> you're involving yourself in a debate about internal
> American policy. Why don't you get a better point
> of
> reference about this issue, read Marvin's, Dan's and
> my posts, try and read the underpinnings of what
> we're
> assuming. Then go to a good search engine and read
> the first 25 topics you find when you do a search
> for
> '2nd amendment'. I tried it on google and got a
> pretty fair mix of pro and con. >>
>
> You've posted advice along this line to several
> people in the course of this discussion.
>
> Please consider the possibility that people who
> disagree with you are just as well-informed on the
> topic as you, but have simply drawn a different
> conclusion from the facts.
>
> Patrick Sweeney
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The only person i've stated is uninformed is Jeroen.
You posted once before defending him and I was less
than kind when I honestly couldn't understand the
point you were trying to make. These are the only
times I recall when I was less than an upstanding
debater. I sincerely apologize to you both. I would
like to point out that i've witnessed much less
courteous behavior on the list, more than once when
Jeroen wasn't on the receiving end. Just trying to
fit in.
dean
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Spot the hottest trends in music, movies, and more.
http://buzz.yahoo.com/
