"John D. Giorgis" wrote:
> Occam's Razor suggests that we take the simplest explanation for this
> observation - the simplest explanation being that those people acted on
> principle, just as they have argued for three years now.
>
I'm sorry John, but that statement is patently ridiculous. Republican
politicians acting on principal having caught their political rival with his
pants down? The Republicans were out to get Clinton the day he won the first
election any which way they could. Not only did they hate Clinton from the
get go, they had Iran-Contra and Watergate to atone for. If they had been
acting on principal they would have left him alone to run the country, seeing
as they couldn't have gotten anyone from the Democratic party more amenable to
their agenda. Hatred, vindictiveness and vengeance, those were the
motivators, and it couldn't get any simpler.
Doug
