At 01:20 20-6-01 -0400, Gautam Mukunda wrote:

>While I actually agree that the US should do a lot more to control
>greenhouse emissions - by far the most important thing we could do is
>switch over to nuclear power, if possible going as far as the french have
>- there are two points I would make to that.  The first is that, as has
>recently been demonstrated, California energy policy is not exactly
>something I _want_ the rest of the United States to follow.  The second is
>that goals are all well and good, but I frankly think the chances that CA
>can actually get to 20% - or even much beyond 11%, to be honest - are
>somewhere between slim and none.  The renewable energy technologies just
>don't exist, and I'm not sure that they ever will.

Energy from renewable sources already exists, therefore the technology 
exists too. I must agree though that the current state of technology 
doesn't make widespread use of renewable energy possible. It will still 
require a lot of money and a lot of research before that will happen.

Here's a thought: instead of wasting zillions of dollars on some missile 
shield, let's spend that money on research into renewable energy. Now 
*that* should give things a boost...   :)


Jeroen

_________________________________________________________________________
Wonderful World of Brin-L Website:                    http://go.to/brin-l

Reply via email to