>
>FWIW, I believe that the key is to allow everyone more
>freedom, instead of less as some of the more
>socialist-minded among us promote. Making the
>individual stronger and smarter is how we get there. I liked what you were
>saying about freedom and the
>internet.
>
Unfortunately, one of the downsides of lowering community control and giving
private groups more leeway is that they can often use that leeway to
restrict the options of others.
Let us look at one type of restriction of corporate freedom that I support,
because it gives me more options. (This isn't a theoretical argument, BTW,
the attempts to work around this have affected me personally.) Companies
are not free to enter agreements to never hire employees or former employees
of competitors. The reason for this is that, which such an agreement, even
the best producers have absolutely no leverage (unless they have spare tens
of millions to start their own company.) Do you support restrictions of
freedom such as this, or do you think that companies can have an agreement
to never hire employees away from each other?
Dan M.
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
