At 12:01 AM 7/19/01 -0500 Dan Minette wrote:
>I would tend to disagree.  I know the "social sciences" consider themselves
>science, but there is a lot of difference between ecconomics and science.
>Compare the predictive ability of the best ecconomist with the 100,000th
>best physicist. :-)

But that's irrelevant.   

To quote Alfred, Lort Tennyson "science is trained and ordered common sense."

You can't define a science based on the ability of its most trained members
to make predictions.  That definition is unworkable.

The question is whether or not the specialists rigorously apply the
scientific method to their work.   On this basis, I think that Economics
most certainly qualifies.

JDG
__________________________________________________________
John D. Giorgis       -         [EMAIL PROTECTED]      -        ICQ #3527685
   We are products of the same history, reaching from Jerusalem and
 Athens to Warsaw and Washington.  We share more than an alliance.  
      We share a civilization. - George W. Bush, Warsaw, 06/15/01

Reply via email to