On 19 Jul 2001, at 16:12, Ronn Blankenship wrote: > It may sound like a "cheap shot," but what it comes down to is that if > the government makes the rules, ultimately the only way they have to > enforce them on an unwilling populace is by force. That's when you > get Nazi Germany or Communist China. > > Or do you think that everyone who reaches a certain age (60? 70?) > ought to voluntarily turn over all their assets to the government and > use no more health care so it may go to those more deserving? aka _The Forever War_ ? Health ratings on the 70th birthbays? bah... Andy Dawn Falcon
- Re: Ethics, death, and cost. Alberto Monteiro
- Re: Ethics, death, and cost. Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
- Re: Ethics, death, and cost. Dan Minette
- Re: Ethics, death, and cost. Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Ethics, death, and cost. Alberto Monteiro
- Re: Ethics, death, and cost. Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
- Re: Ethics, death, and cost. Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Ethics, death, and cost. Andrew Crystall
- Re: Ethics, death, and co... Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Ethics, death, and cost. Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Ethics, death, and cost. Andrew Crystall
- Right to Children Re: Ethics, ... John D. Giorgis
- Re: Right to Children Re:... Andrew Crystall
- Re: Right to Children... Ronn Blankenship
- Re: Right to Children... J. van Baardwijk
- Re: Right to Chil... Dan Minette
- Re: Right to Children Re:... Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten
- Re: Ethics, death, and cost. Ronn Blankenship
