"J. van Baardwijk" wrote:
>
>
> You know, Dan, I'm getting quite sick and tired of people (like you and
> Gautum) continuously misinterpreting my posts, and sitting on their high
> horses believing that while their opponents must provide proof for
> literally everything, their own claims seemingly must be accepted at face
> value without any proof whatsoever.
>
> I will explain one more time.
Jeroen, the question is _How exactly has the U.S. committed "crimes against
humanity". You made that statement, but you haven't backed it up.
>
> I provided sources to show why using landmines in Korea is a bad idea.
But a bad idea is not necessarily a "crime against humanity". You have
accused a nation and by association, its people, of a heinous crime. Posting
references that state that it might be a "bad idea" does not substantiate
those accusations. If you meant "bad idea" instead of "crimes against
humanity" then say so. If you believe that "crimes against humanity" have
been committed, please post a reference that substantiates that accusation
because nothing you have yet posted comes remotely close to doing so.
I give you the benefit of the doubt because I know that English isn't your
primary language, but at this point I have to believe you know that there is a
huge gap between "bad idea" and "crime against humanity". I happen to think
your sources are credible and even agree with your position to some extent.
But I don't see any evidence of a "crime against humanity" or anything even
close, and I don't see anything in your web sites that does either.
> I've been trying to argue advantages/disadvantages from the start, but you
> don't seem to have noticed it...
>
We have all noticed it, many of us agree that mines are probably a bad idea.
Does anyone else on the list consider any of the information you posted as
evidence of a "crime against humanity?". That is the question we are debating
now.
Doug
