No, it is a sound idea. """"IF"""""" it is proved that a nation
supported and financed this, they should become glass-fused parking
lots.
At 11:59 11-9-01 -0400, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
>Slightly less reliable:
>2 airplanes seem to be in the air headed toward Houston and LA out of
>contact with the FAA. They are presumed hijacked.
More of the less reliable stuff:
The FBI is said to be following an airplane (presumed hijacked) on its
way
to Washington.
>This conspiracy was far too large to keep secret for very long. We
will
>find out who did this. We will have vengeance - of that I have no
>doubt. If it was a country, then it does not even seem impossible that
>nuclear weapons will be used
Now *that* would be a bad idea. If some government is behind these
attacks,
and nuclear weapons are used to retaliate, even more innocent people
will
be killed. What good will that do? Can president Bush then tell the
world
that he is PROUD to have avenged the deaths of thousands of innocent
American civilians by killing thousands of innocent civilians in an
other
country?
Haven't enough innocent people died already today?
>But we are Americans. We are stronger, and better, than whoever has
>done this to us.
Not if the US decides to use nuclear weapons to get their revenge. I
know
that the entire country will demand revenge, but "an eye for an eye, a
tooth for a tooth" is not the path for civilised Western nations to
follow.
That method should stay where it belongs: in the past.
>We will go on, and we will heal. I believe that if I believe nothing
>else on this earth. May God protect you all.
If the US would be crazy enough to use nuclear weapons, then you better
pray that your god has mercy on all Americans -- because there is no
doubt
in my mind that many more of them will then die in terrorist attacks.
Jeroen
