Re: Ch. 8: Alterity

[Russell Chapman]

Julia Thompson wrote:

> I was able to ignore enough of the formatting to make it out all right,
> but it wasn't the easiest read.  Maybe the codes could be taken out and
> a cleaner version posted?
>

No amount of code removal is going to make it an easy read - obfuscation and
pleonasm on a grand scale. Why do scholars need to use supererogation and
redundant words, when the rest of us get by with everyday English?
Alterity indeed...

Russell C.