Ronn Blankenship wrote:
>
> At 12:10 AM 9/18/01, you wrote:
>
> >
> >No amount of code removal is going to make it an easy read - obfuscation and
> >pleonasm on a grand scale. Why do scholars need to use supererogation and
> >redundant words, when the rest of us get by with everyday English?
> >Alterity indeed...
> >
> >Russell C.
>
> Umm, keeper of the list rules?
>
> Could we add "Eschew obfuscation" to the rules for posters?
We might want to also add "If you don't understand terms used in a post,
ask; you'll get several helpful replies that should help."
Julia
who tries to eschew obfuscation and would like to be informed when she's
not succeeding
