----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Brin-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 1:25 PM
Subject: "Under God" (Was Re: Tragedy in Israel)


> In a message dated 12/5/01 6:23:28 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> <<
> > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > > Van: Robert Seeberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Verzonden: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 01:46
> > > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Onderwerp: Re: Tragedy in Israel
> >
> > > > > Minor quibble - despite the best efforts of the current US
> > > > > President, the United States is not a Christian country.
> > > >
> > > > That is not how it looks from outside the US. Let?s see. You let
your
> > > > children pledge allegiance to the flag every school day. Quote from
> > > > that pledge: "one nation, under God". A quite large area of the US
is
> > >
> > > "One nation under God" was added to the pledge in a stupid attempt to
> > > fight athiest commies. Was this in the 50s? Anyone?
> >
> > Well, now that the threat of atheist commies is gone (assuming that
threat
> > was ever real), would it not be about time to remove that phrase from
the
> > pledge?
> >
> There is indeed movement in that direction. But the "pledge" is very
> unofficial, so its up to locals to change it as they see fit >>
>
> And the movement may go nowhere except in liberal areas of the country
> because the idea may be viewed as anti-American.  Removing "under God"
from a
> pledge of Allegiance might be viewed by some as anti-American, but this
> shouldn't be a surprise if you understand our history.
>
> Jeroen, you might consider reading any piece of US currency.  It says "In
God
> We Trust".  Re-read the major founding US documents: Declaration of
> Independence or the US Constitution.  The phrase "under God" may have been
> added in the 50's, but it comes from a much older tradition in this
country
> of Judeo-Christian values.  And, I'm re-iterating myself here... this
country
> was founded on and by extension its founding laws were designed around
> Judeo-Christian values.  But our laws are secular ones that do not
interfere
> with, promote or attack any religion.
>
I disagree on one point. Instead of Judeo/christian values, I would claim
self-evident values. But it likely depends on the specific instance which
would apply.

xponent
quibblemiester
rob


Reply via email to