At 03:53 PM 12/4/01 +0100 Baardwijk, J. van DTO/SLWPD/RZO/BOZO wrote:
>No, but that is no reason to not bomb Israel. Israel has performed an act of
>aggression (occupation) which makes it alright to attack it.
You mean, that because the Arabs attacked Israel on three previous
occasions, and have *still* refused to accept a peace treaty - despite the
fact that Israel has offerred some pretty generous terms - that it is
alright for Israel to attack the Arabs?
JDG
P.S. One of two sides in this conflict responds to what they consider as
"attacks" by blowing up civilians in marketplaces. One of two sides in
this conflict is repeatedly criticized by Jeroen for their actions in this
conflict. Any theories about why these two sides don't match?
__________________________________________________________
John D. Giorgis - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ICQ #3527685
"Freedom itself was attacked today, and Freedom will be Defended."
-U.S. President George W. Bush, 09/11/01
