Could be misdirection... > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 12:14 PM > To: Brin-L > Subject: Re: Who's on First, What's on Second.... (Was: Re: Ignoring > Source Materials) > > > > In a message dated 1/23/02 2:31:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > << The message came from an AT&T network. There's only one person who has > > posted here recent with an "att.net" address. His initials are R.B. > > > Nick >> > > This doesn't really seem like Ronn's style. :) > > Jon >
- RE: Who's on First, What's on Second.... Nick Arnett
- Re: Who's on First, What's on Se... Erik Reuter
- RE: Who's on First, What's o... Nick Arnett
- RE: Who's on First, What... Gautam Mukunda
- Re: Who's on First, What... Doug
- Re: Who's on First, What... Erik Reuter
- Re: Who's on First, ... Julia Thompson
- Re: Who's on Fi... Erik Reuter
- RE: Who's on First, ... Nick Arnett
- Re: Who's on First, What's on Se... JonNRob2002
- Re: Who's on First, What's o... Nick Arnett
- Re: Who's on First, What's on Se... John Garcia
- RE: Who's on First, What's on Se... Baardwijk, J. van DTO/SLWPD/RZO/BOZO
- RE: Who's on First, What's on Se... Baardwijk, J. van DTO/SLWPD/RZO/BOZO
- RE: Who's on First, What's o... Nick Arnett
- RE: Who's on First, What... J. van Baardwijk
- Re: Who's on First, ... Robert Seeberger
- RE: Who's on First, ... John D. Giorgis
- Re: Who's on First, What's on Se... JonNRob2002
- The English Meaning Of "... J. van Baardwijk
- RE: Who's on First, What's on Se... Bemmzim
