On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 12:37:31PM -0200, Alberto Monteiro wrote: > So, the problem reduces to _defining_ what kind of > threats and c*nsorship is acceptable. > > IMHO, if purely technical threats and c*nsorship > is what we want, then anyone can be a listowner.
Of course. > OTOH, if we wish to c*nsor name-calling, shouting, > harassment, etc, then the listowner must be a > semi-lurker [which would _also_ discredit Julia :-)] I don't want this. > That?s interesting, because here in Brazil when we > discuss c*nsorship in the TV and we want to come > to an example of a country where covert c*nsorship > exists, we cite the USA :-P Hmmm. Would you care to explain? -- "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.erikreuter.com/
