Julia Thompson wrote: > >> IMHO, if purely technical threats and c*nsorship >> is what we want, then anyone can be a listowner. >> OTOH, if we wish to c*nsor name-calling, shouting, >> harassment, etc, then the listowner must be a >> semi-lurker [which would _also_ discredit Julia :-)]
(...) > > But if the general will of the list is that I step > down as listowner, I'll be fine with that. > Despite what I wrote above - which was constructed as a reductio-ad-absurdum argument - I don�t think you should step down. But let first discuss what the listowners shall do before we begin discussing if the current listowners are well-suited for the job. Alberto Monteiro
