In a message dated 1/30/2002 5:40:37 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


A warning, Gautam, not a threat. Saying "shut up or we will shoot you" is
a
> threat. Telling someone that his behaviour got him one step closer to
being
> banned is a warning that his behaviour has some room for improvement.
>

Who agrees or disagrees with this?



It seems self-serving to me. I have not read all of the posts about this and did not see the "fing Nazi post at all but I did see John's post and it seemed rather standard except for the shouting. I have a problem when one list owner is party to the dispute and another list owner is never involved with the list.




Reply via email to