Marvin Long, Jr. wrote:

> Ya know, it may turn out that a science like psychohistory is less
> far-fetched than the idea that such a science could evolve and perpetuate
> itself in secrecy.


I know this has been discussed on list before, but its been a while. 
    Wasn't the reason, or at least one of the reasons that Asimov's 
universe was devoid of aliens that he was under the impression that 
psychohistory would be far too complex in the presence of multiple 
intelligent life forms?


-- 
Doug

email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.zo.com/~brighto

"Imagine all the people,
Living for Today"

John Lennon

Reply via email to