----- Original Message ----- From: "Baardwijk, J. van DTO/SLWPD/RZO/BOZO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 2:23 AM Subject: Psycho-analysis (was RE: What John Said)
> Now this would be interesting: psycho-analysis by someone who actually knows > what he or she is talking about, instead of The Fool�s amateur > psycho-analysis. (Just trying to live up to his nickname, I guess). > Please don't insult someone and lead with your chin at the same time Jeroen. Inviting psychoanalysis on the list is not a good idea....those of us with DSM-IV books and professional therapists available know better than to drag out the books or get the therapists to analyze your writings, but such an invitation makes it technically ethical. Lets not go there Jeroen, OK? (As an aside, early in the marriage we established a "no therapising in a fight rule." None of us has perfect mental health and we all can be diagnosed with at least a bit of nerosis IMHO.) If you want to respond to a post on this issue, why don't you respond to one that people put a lot of thought and care in, instead of a quick 1 or 2 liner. (No insult intended to the Fool) Ronn's post would be an example. You could respond to mine too. If you do, I promise to work hard to be polite while discussing a very difficult subject. Dan M.
