> From: Baardwijk, J. van DTO/SLWPD/RZO/BOZO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > Van: It Who Is Known As The Fool [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > I never cease to be amazed by some people�s ability to read things in > > > a message that are not there. What gave you the idea that I am > > > suggesting that one wrong makes another wrong right? > > > > By saying that you did nothing wrong when (apparently) a lot of people > > seem to think you did, in reaction to someone else's wrong. WrongA + > > WrongB = 'but wait, I did nothing wrong'. > > > > You are developing a persecution complex. > > Now this would be interesting: psycho-analysis by someone who actually knows > what he or she is talking about, instead of The Fool�s amateur > psycho-analysis. (Just trying to live up to his nickname, I guess). That is not the meaning of the word 'Fool' mister English. FYI: in almost all good quality fantasy, the character who is 'the Fool' is Always the Wisest person. The wise fool. > Of course, one might wonder if someone who goes to great lengths to hide his > identity might be the one here with a persecution complex... I like anonymity. Nobody's uncovered me yet, so. > But hey, this might get interesting anyway. He Who Is Known As The Fool, > please elaborate on your statement "you are developing a persecution > complex". Full pschycho-analysis please, complete with links to relevant > on-line documents. The worst thing that can happen to you is that you will > fail to provide such an in-depth analysis and susbsequently have to retract > your statement. I did not mean that quite so literally. But aside from that, you act as if you are always right, you act as if you were always being attacked (i.e. being unfairly labeled/accused of this, that, the other, etcetera) even when they are trying to get you to clarify your position, and you never make concessions. I'm not going to touch on 'passive aggressive' behavior that others are more qualified to discuss, nor the use of 'veiled threats'.
