Jeroen wrote: > > So this time, the US will be fighting without the support > of the rest of the world (except perhaps for Great Britain). > Does the US government want to get rid of Saddam Hussein > so desperately that they are willing to risk increased > aggression against US targets worldwide? Because I predict > that that is exactly what will happen... > This is a cost-benefit thing. If the existence of Saddam Hussein causes USA targets to be in danger for a long period of time, then it might be worth increasing this risk for a short time so that this risk would be lower in the near future.
Frankly, I can�t see any reason why the other western nations can�t support this Crusade against Saddam Hussein except cowardice. There is no moral reason to support Saddam or his regime. Alberto Monteiro the bloodthirsty
