There is still the issue of the other Arab states - no matter whether
they like Saddam or not, they like Western countries waging war on Arabs
less. To be part of that is to antagonise the other Arab nations.
As an example, Australia is already in a difficult situation with our
vocal support of the war against terror vs our continuing strong
relations with Iran now that GWB has announced his Axis of Evil.
Someone recently posted an article which talked about the US
antagonising billions to support a few million Israelis - maybe Europe
feels the same way about Iraq?

Cheers
Russell C.

But it is, on the other hand, very important to remember that what the Arab
states _say_ and what they actually believe are often two very different
things.  I was just in a seminar with an Arab political scientist - I don't
want to identify him more closely than that - and he was quite clear in
saying that there was widespread support for eliminating Saddam Hussein,
particularly among the liberalizers in the Arab world.  For obvious reasons,
we want to support the liberalizers.  He thought that a decisive removal of
Hussein and his regime would both be very good for the immediate stability
of the Gulf _and_ would provide great encouragement to liberal forces within
the Arab world.  But he was also unwilling to say that in public - I assume
fear of reprisal from the radical Islamists.

As for the difficult situation that the US has put you in - maybe that's a
good thing.  Maybe you _shouldn't have_ close relations with a government
that supports Hamas and Islamic Jihad, that just attempted to smuggle
weapons into the West Bank and the Gaza Strip in a gross violation of the
Oslo Accords, and that has been pretty clearly shown to be responsible for
the murder of American servicemen in the 1998 bombings.  I, like most
Americans, am grateful for Australia's support - but Bush's statement causes
you to rethink your relationship with Iran, I can't say I'm unhappy with
that fact.  In fact, I'd say good for him for introducing some moral clarity
into a situation where moral ambiguity only favors the terrorist states.

Gautam

Reply via email to