I'm going to do a link analysis that has nothing to do with who starts threads. That was only a way to approximate the network without having to identify who responded to whom for every message, which will require additional code.
But my current client has kept me busy -- and I decided to do at least some of the coding in Python, which I'm still learning. Can't say when it might be available. Nick > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of J. van Baardwijk > Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 4:33 AM > To: Brin-L > Subject: Re: Brin-l network visualization > > > At 22:13 23-2-02 -0500, John Giorgis wrote: > > > >I would like to suggest that threads usually are started by > folks who decide > > >to finally change the name of a thread. Conversations here > tend to wander. > > > >Yes, Andrea and I were/are the Champions of updating subject > headers. To > >count each of our changed subjects as a "new thread" is > basically a flaw in > >the analysis, IMHO. > > Then how, IYHO, should the analysis be carried out? What is your solution > for removing that what you perceive as a flaw? > > > Jeroen > > _________________________________________________________________________ > Wonderful World of Brin-L Website: http://www.Brin-L.com > Tom's Photo Gallery: http://tom.vanbaardwijk.com
