Chad wrote: > J and J's defensive numbers are so high, they appear to be unswayed but > anything anyone else says, including those posts or ideas that tend to > support their own position/agenda/evil intentions (;->) > > Therefore, while we, the little people here, with insignificant defensive > values are bothered and annoyed by the J and J rants, it is essential for > either to stay 'healthy' =>high defensive values. If you carry on with the > analogy, it could be considered a form of exersise. > > So the question is... are they succeeding? I think one criteria that > provides proof, is how annoying it is to us. Annoyance is another form of > idea infection. They have to do it, but it is not for our sakes.
You know what I'd like to see? I'd like to see J&J swap sides for a week. I don't think either of them is a good enough debater to do it, but it'd be amusing for us. Of course, I also am starting to think that they secretly like each other (and I mean LIKE like), the way they carry on so. Adam C. Lipscomb [EMAIL PROTECTED] Troublemaker
