At 08:01 AM 4/30/02, you wrote:
>At 10:50 29-04-2002 -0500, Dan Minette wrote:
>
>>2) Gracefully retreat from positions that prove to be in error.  An example
>>of this is your claim that you never read a post you quoted
>
>Er, when did I say that? I tend to have a fairly good memory when it comes 
>to remembering what I wrote, but I do not remember saying I never read a 
>post I quoted (after all, how can I quote something I did not read?).
>
>
>>4) Watch for how your arguments play in the community.  In particular, you
>>can see the responses to your "threat" to put people in you "these bad
>>people hurt my feelings" website. No one has written in support of this.
>
>As I have said before, those pages would show the misbehaviour of people 
>towards other members, not just towards me (although I still believe I 
>could fill a few megabytes of webspace with just that).
>
>The purpose of those pages would be twofold. First, it might encourage 
>people to keep their behaviour civilised when they know their misbehaviour 
>will become a matter of public record. Second, it will give others an 
>indication about the extent to which a poster is to be taken seriously. 
>Someone with a spotless record can be taken seriously, but someone whose 
>record measures hundreds of kilobytes or more is likely to be someone to 
>stay away from, since that person is likely to just start another flame 
>war when someone disagrees with him.
>
>
>Jeroen



As someone said about 10 years ago this week:


�Can't we all just get along?�



-- Ronn! :)

God bless America,
Land that I love!
Stand beside her, and guide her
Thru the night with a light from above.
 From the mountains, to the prairies,
To the oceans, white with foam�
God bless America!
My home, sweet home.

-- Irving Berlin (1888-1989)

Reply via email to