> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Kevin Street [snip] > Er, please pardon the digression, but I don't think that the number of > replies is a terribly valid way to judge the strength of an > argument. And I'd like to add that I don't imagine that I'm measuring the strength of arguments. I'm trying to measure the influence of each person. It's like judging the size of a stone thrown into a pond by measuring the ripples it produces. Nick
- List, list, who's got the list? Nick Arnett
- Re: List, list, who's got the list? Robert Seeberger
- Re: List, list, who's got the list? John D. Giorgis
- RE: List, list, who's got the list? Nick Arnett
- Re: List, list, who's got the list? The Fool
- Re: List, list, who's got the list? Matt Grimaldi
- RE: List, list, who's got the list? Horn, John
- Re: List, list, who's got the list? Reggie Bautista
- RE: List, list, who's got the list? Kevin Street
- Re: Social networks (RE: List, list, who's g... Nick Arnett
- Re: Social networks (RE: List, list, who... Dan Minette
- Re: Social networks (RE: List, list... Marvin Long, Jr.
- Re: Social networks (RE: List, ... Julia Thompson
- Social networks (was RE: List, list, who's got t... Nick Arnett
- RE: List, list, who's got the list? Chad Cooper
