On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 06:32:53PM -0500, The Fool wrote: > > From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 06:23:00PM -0500, The Fool wrote: > > > > > You are implying that I was advocating something that I may or may > > not be > > > > advocating. > > > > You wrote: > > > > Disturbing questions #23-25, The very fact that fox would suggest > > these things, and that they got such high yes percentages. > > Because they are a news organization advocating here, the removal of > amendments, 1, 2, 4, 5 (at least tangentally), and probably others I > am less familiar with. In no way did I suggest they they had no right > to say it, which is what you are implying. You were also imlying > things about that wilber07.
The implications are getting thick here. I wasn't aware I implied most of those things. I was responding to you saying that it was disturbing that FOX news would have a survey about requiring a test to buy a firearm, and also you saying it was disturbing that many people responded that it was a good idea. The only thing I meant to convey was that it is inconsistent to act that way about guns, but act in a different way about Wilbur being allowed to post what he wishes in a way that he wishes. Is that clear now? -- "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.erikreuter.com/
