On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 06:32:53PM -0500, The Fool wrote:

> > From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 06:23:00PM -0500, The Fool wrote:
> >
> > > You are implying that I was advocating something that I may or may
>
> not be
>
> > > advocating.
> >
> > You wrote:
> >
> >   Disturbing questions #23-25, The very fact that fox would suggest
> >   these things, and that they got such high yes percentages.
>
> Because they are a news organization advocating here, the removal of
> amendments, 1, 2, 4, 5 (at least tangentally), and probably others I
> am less familiar with.  In no way did I suggest they they had no right
> to say it, which is what you are implying.  You were also imlying
> things about that wilber07.

The implications are getting thick here. I wasn't aware I implied most
of those things.

I was responding to you saying that it was disturbing that FOX news
would have a survey about requiring a test to buy a firearm, and also
you saying it was disturbing that many people responded that it was a
good idea.

The only thing I meant to convey was that it is inconsistent to act that
way about guns, but act in a different way about Wilbur being allowed to
post what he wishes in a way that he wishes.

Is that clear now?

-- 
"Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>       http://www.erikreuter.com/

Reply via email to