On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 07:23:19PM -0500, The Fool wrote: > Yes. Yes. I corrected Grimaldi when he erronously said that wilber > had not violated the etiqutte guidlines. And I mocked him. And I > ask how many lurkers would have gone away because of wilber07. And > I posted a comment about the phychology of communities. And I said > something to effect that I did not want wilber07 to crosspost anything > that had my email address on it anywhere.
Okay, now something is getting through my thick skull, but you'll have to bear with me a little more since the thickness is great indeed. A) From what you wrote, how would you characterize your expressed view on defending Wilbur from being banned versus advocating Wilbur being banned, on a scale of 1 to 10: defending --> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 <-- trying to ban B) From what you wrote, how would you characterize your expressed view on defending the right to unregulated (or minimal regulation) purchasing of firearms versus highly regulated purchasing of firearms, on a scale of 1 to 10: unregulated purchases --> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 <-- restricted purchases To me, it looked like A) 6 and B) 1 -- "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.erikreuter.com/
