> From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 06:23:00PM -0500, The Fool wrote: > > You are implying that I was advocating something that I may or may not be > > advocating. > > You wrote: > > Disturbing questions #23-25, The very fact that fox would suggest > these things, and that they got such high yes percentages.
Because they are a news organization advocating here, the removal of amendments, 1, 2, 4, 5 (at least tangentally), and probably others I am less familiar with. In no way did I suggest they they had no right to say it, which is what you are implying. You were also imlying things about that wilber07.
