42
> -----Original Message-----
> From: The Fool [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 04:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: poll
>
>
> > From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 09:04:58PM -0500, The Fool wrote:
> > > > From: Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > > On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 08:21:53PM -0500, The Fool wrote:
> > > > > 5.
> > > >
> > > > Okay, I say 6, you say 5. That's not a big discrepancy, so let's
> call
> > > > that issue settled.
> > >
> > > I was grading your statement about guns.
> >
> > Which was equivalent to yours. So a 5.
> >
> > I take your lack of disagreement as acceptance of a 1 for B).
> >
> > So, on the issue of speech, where the worst injury is a bit
> of frayed
> > nerves, we have a 5. On the issue of guns, which kill and
> maim when
> > used irresponsibly, we have a 1. Now it is probably just my thick
> skull
> > again, but this does not seem consistent to me.
>
> I rated _your_ statement on guns. I did not rate any of *my*
> statements. I am not playing your little numbers game.
>
>
